How We Rank Mutual Funds
How We Determine Fund Ranking
Nobias employs a systematic and algorithm-based approach to research and score mutual fund schemes. Our research process consists of multiple steps, which we will describe below:
STEP 1 - Key Return & Ratio Analysis
To assess equity mutual fund schemes, we start by analysing its key ratios on performance, cost and risk based on all available data dating back to the inception of the fund
Performance:
5, 3 and 1 year rolling returns
10, 5 and 3 year CAGR
Cost
Expense Ratio
Fund specific information
Fund Tenure
Risk:
Sharpe Ratio
Measures investment return relative to its volatility, indicating how much excess return an investor receives for taking on additional risk.
Sortino Ratio
Similar to Sharpe Ratio, but focuses solely on downside risk, providing a better assessment of an investment's performance in unfavourable conditions.
Treynor Ratio
Evaluates investment return adjusted for systematic (market-related) risk, helping investors compare investments based on their sensitivity to market movements.
When these ratios consistently show better performance over an extended period, they receive higher scores
STEP 2 - Fund House Analysis
We conduct a fund house analysis to evaluate their past performance, considering their management of all their funds. This assessment includes:
A performance score based on the performance of all funds managed by the fund house.
The fund house’s cumulative experience in managing funds.
The fund house's score on grievance reddressal.
STEP 3 - Final Score Calculation
The final scores are derived from the amalgamation of the Fund Score and Fund Manager Score. Mutual fund schemes are scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with 100 being the highest score and 0 being the lowest.
STEP 4 - Ranking
Rankings are determined by assessing the final scores of the funds, thereby showcasing their relative standings within their respective categories.
Note - The Nobias scoring and ranking model is updated quarterly. We analyse all equity category funds with a track record of more than 5 years.
This comprehensive and systematic approach ensures that our evaluations are based on up-to-date data, aiding investors in making well-informed decisions.